ACT 12-1 Computer Crimes
1. From the cases summarized above, explain what constitutes a computer crime?
Computer crimes are deliberate actions to steal, damage, or destroy computer data without authorization, as well as accessing a computer system and/or account without authorization. These unethical acts become criminal acts as it violates existing laws in the juridical area where it was committed.
According to study, the frequency of this crime is 40 times greater compared with classical crime, and even 90% remains practically undiscovered because the detection and producing evidence for this crime is exceptionally difficult. This is also why some of the cases mentioned in the handbook took months, even years before discovery and conviction.
Computer crimes are manifested in the ff:
· computer trickery (spamming case)
· financial theft and misuse (credit card/stock fraud)
· forgery of data and documents (stock fraud/hate and vengeance case)
· making and use of computer viruses (case of Melissa virus)
· computer sabotage and espionage (hacking by a Boston man)
· hackership (hacking by a Boston man/ hate and vengeance case)
-
Three Example of Computer Crime
Disaster fraud is defined as an activity with the purpose to defraud individuals or the government after a natural or man-made catastrophe. Some common examples include unscrupulous operators who persuade disaster fraud victims to claim more damages than actually occurred. A computer-related disaster fraud is the building of websites indicating bank accounts where donations to disaster victims like the 9/11 attack may be deposited.
Disaster fraud used to be a classic crime but criminals who perpetrate these crimes realize the power and advantage of computers and start using them as helping device when committing classic crimes. Who knows one day, the same scheme may be used for disasters/typhoons in the Philippines.
1st cyberstalking in US
Robert James Murphy is the first person in the United States to be charged with what many are calling "cyberstalking." Technically, Murphy has been charged with violating Title 47 of the US Code, which prohibits using any telecommunications device to "to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass" any person. The statute, originally designed to thwart phone stalkers, was amended in 1997 to cover e-mail and other forms of electronic communications, yet it has never been put to the test. Murphy is being accused of harassing a woman whom he had dated 13 years ago by sending her unsolicited e-mails of a questionable nature He has pleaded not guilty to all 26 counts of harassing Joelle Ligon, and if convicted, could be fined US$250,000 and face up to two years on each count. The 26 counts are comprised of individual violations that occurred only between May 2002 and April 2003.
Investigators believe Murphy began sending to Ligon and her co-workers in 1998, tracking her from his computer as she moved from state to state and job to job. Ligon said she deleted and ignored the messages for four years, then began saving them as evidence and approached police, eventually gaining the help of the FBI, U.S. attorney's office and King County prosecutors.
Identity Theft is committed by anyone who knowingly transfers or uses without legal authority the identification documentation of another person with the intent to commit, aid, or abet any unlawful activity that constitutes a felony.
W-9095 Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Tax Form Scam
IRS WARNS OF SCHEME TO STEAL IDENTITY AND FINANCIAL DATA
WASHINGTON - The Internal Revenue Service warned today of a fraudulent scheme currently circulating that uses fictitious bank correspondence and IRS forms in an attempt to trick taxpayers into disclosing their personal and banking data. The information fraudulently obtained is then used to steal the taxpayer's identity and bank account deposits.
In this scam, a letter claiming to be from the taxpayer's bank states that the "bank" is updating its records in order to exempt the taxpayer from reporting interest or having tax withheld on interest paid on his or her bank accounts or other financial dealings. The scheme promoters then use the faxed information to impersonate the taxpayer and gain access to the taxpayer's finances.
One such phony form is labeled "W-9095, Application Form for Certificate Status/Ownership for Withholding Tax." The form requests personal data frequently used to prove identity, including passport number and mother's maiden name. It also asks for sensitive financial data such as bank account numbers, passwords and PIN numbers that can be used to gain access to the accounts.
Identity thieves can use someone's personal data to:
.jpg)
